The study, from a group of international researchers and published in the journal Science on Thursday, found that even in a “best-case scenario” where the amount of plastic pollution was reduced by 80% by 2040, there would still be a massive build-up of accumulated plastic.
“The biggest takeaway from our work is that if we don’t do anything, the plastic pollution problem is going to become unmanageable. Doing nothing is not an option, said Dr. Winnie Lau, co-author of the study and senior manager for Pew’s Preventing Ocean Plastics campaign.
Lau called their findings a “bad news, good news situation” because while the plastic pollution problem is set to get worse, we have all the knowledge, technology and tools to make a huge dent.
The team found that seriously ramped up global efforts could cut plastic pollution by 40% from 2016 levels, or 78% relative to a “business as usual” model by 2040.
A rapid growth in plastic production, spurred by a rise in single-use plastics and a “throw-away” culture has exacerbated the problem, the report said. Meanwhile, waste management systems in countries around the world don’t have the capacity to safely dispose of or recycle plastic waste.
Dr. James Palardy, co-author of the report and Director of Pew’s Conservation Science Program, said the true cost plastic pollution has on human health and the environment — and of doing nothing to reduce it — is largely unknown, but waiting to find out how it affects us is not the answer.
“Do we really want to be guinea pigs for a global experiment?” he said.
To avoid a plastic pile up greater than the estimated 710 million metric tons (782 US tons) by 2040, the team said coordinated global action is needed. That means reducing plastic consumption, increasing the rates of reusing plastic, improving waste collection and recycling, and expanding safe disposal systems.
And everyone is needed to do their part.
“This isn’t a problem for the developing world, this is a problem for everyone to solve,” said Palardy.
The team set out to figure solutions for solving plastic pollution. They created a model that mapped out the entire global plastic system — from production to waste — and developed five scenarios to estimate reductions in plastic pollution between 2016 and 2040.
They found that there is no silver bullet solution to reducing global plastic pollution.
Instead, change is needed across the whole supply chain, they said, from the manufacturing of plastics, to pre-consumption (known as upstream) and after use (recycling and reusing) to stop the spread of plastic pollution into the environment.
“There is a role for everybody and every sector. We can only solve this problem if everyone does what they need to do,” said Lau.
Palardy said their research showed that implementing the best case scenario — where 80% of plastic pollution is cut by 2040 — didn’t involve big costs.
“It actually saved governments money to implement this,” he said. The real challenge, he said, would be “how do we show the world that this is a more appropriate solution, it’s better for the environment, it’s better for tax payers, it better for virtually everything.”
One key finding the study identified is that waste mismanagement wasn’t necessarily a problem of having the recycling capacity, landfill space or incinerators, but the bottle neck came from the collection gap.
“There are billions of people without collection services right now. When certain groups say we can recycle our way out of it, you can’t recycle something you haven’t collected. You cant dispose of something you haven’t collected,” said Lau.
By highlighting how vital they are to this sector, the authors said it will hopefully bring them into the part of the economy where their contribution is recognized.
“You go into a bathroom and the bath is overflowing, do you grab a mop or do you turn the tap off?” he said. “Beach clean ups are going and mopping up the floor while the tap is still on. As good as they are, you need to turn off the source.”
One of the biggest challenges to changing our plastic habits is helping people to connect the dots between the plastics they consume and the pollution on our beaches and seas. Plastic takes years — sometimes hundreds of years — to decompose.
Going into schools to raise awareness, Stokes said he uses the example of the 16th century playwright William Shakespeare, saying “if he had had a cup with a straw from 7/11 at that time, the plastic would still be here now.”
“And that’s really quite scary,” he said.
Because plastic is so cheap, there is a need to make alternatives to plastics economically viable so people will start to take them seriously.
“I think it’s a culmination of yes we have the technology, we just need the willpower to want to do it,” Stokes said.